Article Meetings / Events 2 min read
Scientific Groups Express Worry Over Science Conference Cuts
The scientific community often relies on conferences to share new scientific ideas. But many are worried that recent cuts could limit innovation.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
New Obama administration guidelines and legislation pending in Congress that would cut federal agency spending on meetings aren’t winning many fans in the scientific community.
A number of scientific groups — including the Computing Research Association, the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and the U.S. Public Policy Council of ACM — have asked members of Congress and the Office of Management and Budget for exemption from spending and attendance limits, saying the meetings are important for sharing scientific research and industry collaboration.
“Participation in scientific conferences is a critical opportunity for scientists and engineers to keep current in rapidly changing fields of science and technology,” a letter (opens in a new tab) [PDF], dated September 10, states. The Office of Management and Budget says it has not received the letter.
The inability of the government researchers and program managers to participate in these conferences is actually very damaging.
Scientific groups are far from alone on this front — for example, the U.S. Army recently had to cut its attendance (opens in a new tab) at a recent conference, and dozens of National Weather Service employees had to skip a conference after funding for travel wasn’t authorized (opens in a new tab).
Among the people speaking out against the policy is Vinton Cerf, the president of the Association for Computing Machinery. If the name sounds vaguely familiar, it’s because Cerf is considered a “father of the internet (opens in a new tab),” having played a key role in the formation of one of the most successful federally funded scientific projects in U.S. history. While Cerf understands the reasons for the cuts, he considers the action “a terrible penny-wise decision.”
“This is a problem not just for the computing research community, but for almost anyone who’s involved in scientific work,” Cerf told The New York Times (opens in a new tab). “The inability of the government researchers and program managers to participate in these conferences is actually very damaging.”
Should scientific conferences be treated in the same way as more general training conferences? Let us know what you think in the comments.
(TMG archive photo)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!