Skip to content

Article Advocacy 2 min read

Coalition for Patent Fairness Forges Unusual Allies

The Coalition for Patent Fairness has received support from numerous industries and associations, even ones that typically don’t see eye to eye on policy issues.

Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.

Who dare cross the bridge guarded by patent trolls? Associations from nearly every industry, that’s who.

In a letter  (opens in a new tab) to congressional leaders last month, 50 organizations representing a wide variety of industries urged lawmakers to find a solution to so-called patent trolling—where a company purchases patents with no intention to use them in business but sues other companies for infringement. It’s a tactic that has received a lot of attention this year from policymakers and the media and that brought about the resurgence of the Coalition for Patent Fairness  (opens in a new tab).

CPF— founded in 2006 to lobby on behalf of consumer technology giants like Google and Blackberry as Congress considered legislation related to patent litigation—has become the ā€œbig tentā€ for a large network of groups affected by patent trolling.

ā€œThe issue has definitely brought together some strange bedfellows,ā€ said Matt Tanielian, executive director of CPF.

Groups like the Motion Picture Association of America and the Internet Association—which have been at odds over copyright issues—have been able to put their differences aside and get behind the anti-trolling effort. Organizations representing retail, grocers, wireless carriers, hotels, transportation, consumer electronics, publishers, and restaurants (to name a few) are doing the same.

ā€œWhat sometimes gets lost is there’s a reason why all of these groups are together. The reason you are interested in this issue is because you have become a target of patent trolls, plain and simple,ā€ Tanielian said.

Getting so many diverse groups engaged required ā€œa little organizational work,ā€ he said, ā€œbut the desire to work on the issue has been organic. These folks are engaging with the issue because they have a problem that they want to solve.ā€

Still, Tanielian had to get some members of the coalition—associations typically not active in intellectual property issues—up to speed on patent trolling.

ā€œThis is a problem that we’ve been working on for years, so it’s not much of a challenge for us to sit down with somebody and say, ā€˜Here’s the lay of the land, here’s who the players are, here’s what the issues are, here’s where we stand today,ā€™ā€ he said. ā€œWe’re happy to help people get up to speed, educated, and engaged, because we think this is obviously a huge issue for us and having others working on it is only going to help us.ā€

At least three separate bills with bipartisan support  (opens in a new tab) have been introduced  (opens in a new tab) in Congress to limit lawsuits by companies that own patents but don’t produce products. And in June, Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Edith Ramirez called for an investigation into ā€œpatent assertion entities,ā€ saying they may be hurting consumers and the economy.

(iStockphoto/Thinkstock)

Rob Stott

Rob Stott is a contributing editor to Associations Now.

More articles by this author

Tags: #Advocacy #IT Policy #Leadership #patent trolling

Comments

Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.

Log in to your member account or join ASAE!