McDonald’s, NLRB Take “Joint Employer” Battle to Court
Last week, McDonaldâs and the National Labor Relations Board met in an administrative court in a battle over whether the fast-food chain, which is largely made up of franchises, should be treated as an equal employer with its franchisees. The case is being closely watched in the dining and retail spaces.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
The biggest headlines for McDonaldâs these days have nothing to do with its relatively recent decision (opens in a new tab) to start selling all-day breakfast.
Instead, the headlines have everything to do with the companyâs labor practicesâand a case that threatens to create challenges for the franchise model in the restaurant industry.
Last week, an administrative law judge in Manhattan began tackling the issue (opens in a new tab) of whether McDonaldâs should be considered a âjoint employerâ for its franchised locationsâsomething that would effectively redefine the fast-food restaurantsâ locations as part of a large business, rather than each franchise being considered a small business in the eyes of the law.
The court trial is the latest twist in the long-running labor dispute, which had the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) deciding in 2014 that the parent company should receive the joint-employer designation. NLRBâs decision came about at a time of nationwide protests against low-wage fast-food jobs, and the labor complaints that led to the decision were supported by the Service Employees International Union.
In January, the NLRB decided to take the dispute to the administrative court (opens in a new tab) in an effort to push McDonaldâs to change its approach to labor relations.
The courtâs action is expected to be closely watched by industry groups: The 2014 NLRB decision was roundly criticized by a number of trade groups, including the National Retail Federation and the National Restaurant Association.
The International Franchise Association, which is fighting a similar legal battle over Seattleâs minimum-wage law that the group recently appealed to the Supreme Court, threw its support behind the burger chain.
IFA also suggested that the McDonaldâs case would be far from the last battle.
âIFA will continue to contest in all appropriate fora any attempt to change the long established joint employer standard to ensure franchisingâs continued economic growth,â IFA President and CEO Robert Cresanti said in a statement (opens in a new tab). âLocally-owned small businesses are hoping they wonât be the next âtest caseâ by the NLRB as part of a larger strategy orchestrated by activists targeting the franchising business model in a single-minded attempt to grow their membership.â
(iStock Editorial/Thinkstock)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!