Tech Giants Lay Groundwork for Artificial Intelligence Group
Employees of five of the tech worldâs largest companies have been actively meeting to discuss the long-term financial and ethical effects of artificial intelligence on the global economy. The group doesnât yet have a name, but it does have a thorny issue on its mind.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
The increasing sophistication and use of robots and artificial intelligence (AI) are raising some long-term questions of ethics that society will eventually have to deal with.
Fortunately, five of the technology industryâs largest companies are already on top of it. Last week, The New York Times revealed (opens in a new tab) that employees at Googleâs parent company, Alphabet, were meeting with officials from Amazon, Facebook, IBM, and Microsoft to discuss the long-term ramifications of AI on the public. The group is so informal at this point that it doesnât even have a name.
âBut the basic intention is clear: to ensure that A.I. research is focused on benefiting people, not hurting them, according to four people involved in the creation of the industry partnership who are not authorized to speak about it publicly,â the Times article stated.
The article, in highlighting the concerns behind the formation of the group, cited a Stanford University paper released by the schoolâs One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (opens in a new tab), a group that plans to publish a series of papers discussing AIâs global impact over the next century.
One issue highlighted by the report is regulation, which could become more significant as AI technology matures.
âFaced with the profound changes that AI technologies can produce, pressure for âmoreâ and âtougherâ regulation is probably inevitable. Misunderstandings about what AI is and is not could fuel opposition to technologies with the potential to benefit everyone,â the Stanford report states (opens in a new tab) [PDF]. âInappropriate regulatory activity would be a tragic mistake. Poorly informed regulation that stifles innovation, or relocates it to other jurisdictions, would be counterproductive.â
The report, titled âArtificial Intelligence and Life in 2030,â suggests that by following the examples set by the successful regulation of the technology industry on issues of privacy and the reliance of trade groups to set standards, those pitfalls could be avoided.
David Kenny, general manager for Watson, the AI division run by IBM, emphasizes the goal is not to ignore government, but to provide a thoughtful starting point for a disruptive industry sector.
âThere is a role for government and we respect that, [but] a lot of times policies lag the technologies,â Kenny told the Times.
(iStock/Thinkstock)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!