Landmark Immigration Reform Bill Faces Tough Road in House
While a bill offering comprehensive immigration reform in the Senate passed on Thursday in a bipartisan vote with broad association support, the bill will struggle to gain the same level of support in the House of Representatives.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
For the first time in more than a quarter-century, a comprehensive immigration reform bill has passed the Senate. But will the broad support it had in that chamber—and among a wide range of business, labor, and technology groups—be enough to ensure passage in the House?
On Thursday, the 1,200-page Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act (opens in a new tab), which offers a path to residency and citizenship for both low-skilled and high-skilled workers, passed the Senate with bipartisan backing.
The bill, championed by the Senate’s bipartisan “Gang of Eight,” also drew strength from the backing of unlikely allies—the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO. The Senate voted to approve it, 68-32 (opens in a new tab).
The legislation, strongly supported by the technology sector in particular, gained additional bipartisan support after the adoption of an amendment by Sens. John Hoeven (R-ND) and  Bob Corker (R-TN) that would boost border security.
For any legislation, including a conference report, to pass the House, it’s going to have to be a bill that has the support of the majority of our members.
Association Responses
Several associations in the technology, manufacturing, and retail sectors welcomed the news, with the Internet Association calling passage (opens in a new tab) “a momentous step in our nation’s history”; the National Association of Manufacturers saying it was (opens in a new tab) “evidence that bipartisanship can still be found in Washington, DC”;  and the National Grocers Association calling it (opens in a new tab) “an important step in the right direction.”
One of the more high-profile winners is FWD.us, the advocacy group started by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg; it spent $5 million on the immigration reform push, its first major lobbying effort.Â
Despite widespread support for the measure in the business community, the National Federation of Independent Business raised concerns (opens in a new tab) about certain details, particularly a section that would create an agency to measure worker shortages and adjust caps on employment-based visas. NFIB was a high-profile critic of the bill when debate on it started in the full Senate earlier this month.
Next Steps
The bill now goes to the House, where passage is expected to be considerably more difficult. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has pledged to follow the GOP’s unofficial the “Hastert Rule (opens in a new tab)“—named for former Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who refused to  bring a bill to a vote unless it had the support of more than half of his conference’s members.
“For any legislation, including a conference report, to pass the House, it’s going to have to be a bill that has the support of the majority of our members,” Boehner said, according to The Washington Post (opens in a new tab). The speaker suggested that the House would come up with its own version of immigration reform instead.
Opponents of the Senate’s comprehensive bill argue that its border security measures are not strong enough and reject any “pathway to citizenship” provisions for those already in the country illegally, which some consider amnesty.
(iStockphoto/Thinkstock)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!