Camp Plan Would Increase Tax Burden for Nonprofits, ASAE Says
Associations would likely see their tax bills rise if the tax reform plan served up by Rep. Dave Camp last month were to become law. The primary targets for new taxes: unrelated business income and sponsorship revenue.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
 Although the tax reform plan released last month includes provisions to reduce tax rates and increase certain deductions and creditsâpresumably appealing to many individual and corporate taxpayersâthe package could result in significant new tax bills for nonprofits, according to a recent statement from ASAE.
After poring over the comprehensive tax reform draft released by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (opens in a new tab) (R-MI) on February 26, leaders in the association community are raising concerns about specific provisions in the bill that would expand the unrelated business income tax (UBIT) statute and could affect the revenue streams of many associations and tax-exempt organizations.
Proposals in the 979-page bill (opens in a new tab) to make royalties and certain qualified sponsorship payments subject to UBIT are particularly troubling, according to members of ASAEâs public policy team, who have studied the bill.
âRoyalties paid for the use of an organizationâs name or logo closely resemble other passive income for tax-exempt organizations, such as rent, interest, and dividends. Royalties are passive income because the association is not actively involved in the marketing or administration of whatever product or service connected with the arrangement,â ASAE wrote in a message to members last week. âMany associations and other tax-exempt organizations have developed significant royalty revenue streams through the licensing of their names and logos, so this provision would present a significant new tax burden to those groups.â
The Camp bill would tax certain qualified sponsorship payments, treating them much like advertising income to the association. Specifically, the bill would tax those payments if the sponsorship acknowledgement at an event mentions any of the sponsorâs products or if a sponsor is given greater recognition than other donors.
âASAE does not believe that qualified sponsorship payments should be treated as advertising income in cases where there is no more than a âthank youâ provided by the tax-exempt organization,â ASAE said in its message. âRequiring that all sponsors be acknowledged in substantially the same manner is also nonintuitive and will discourage sponsorships.â
ASAE members will travel to Capitol Hill to discuss these and other policy concerns with Ways and Means Committee members and staff during the associationâs legislative fly-in March 25-26.
Few Congress-watchers expect the bill to go far (opens in a new tab), with term limits forcing Camp out of the Ways and Means chairmanship at the end of the current session and with little likelihood that differences on the issue between Republicans and Democrats can be resolved in a midterm election year. Sen. Mitch McConnell  (R-KY) recently told reporters that lawmakers âwill not be able to finish the jobâ on tax reform this year, according to a UPI report (opens in a new tab).
No markup or hearing on the bill has been scheduled.
(Vitaly Smolygin/PublicDomainPhotos)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!