Nonprofits Join Forces With CloudFlare to Prevent Online Censorship
In an effort to neutralize information censorship through distributed denial of service attacks, the company is working with a number of free-speech-minded NGOs to launch a new effort called Project Galileo.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
The internet is one of the worldâs biggest hubs of free speech, but sometimes that freedom of speech is a challenge to come by.
In certain parts of the world, journalists and citizen advocates find themselves at risk of de facto censorship onlineâparticularly via distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, which essentially block access to content by overloading a server with traffic. An example of an organization that might be targeted would be an LGBT rights organization in Africa or the Middle East.
(The issue drew attention earlier this week when two major cloud-based companies, Feedly and Evernote, were taken down by ransom-style DDoS attacks (opens in a new tab).)
Governments or third-party actors can attack a website to censor it when they could never have done so via the courtroom.
Thatâs why CloudFlare, a startup that helps manage performance and security for web servers, has launched Project Galileo, a new effort intended to protect public-interest sites from such speech-muting attacks.
âCloudFlare aims to keep ideas moving,â the company states on its website (opens in a new tab). âIf a website participating in Project Galileo comes under attack, CloudFlare will extend full protection to ensure the site stays onlineâno matter its location, no matter its content.â
Help From Nonprofits
CloudFlare is working with 14 nonprofit organizations and advocacy groups to get the project off the ground, identifying websites at risk for DDoS attacks. Among the many organizations involved are the American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Democracy and Technology, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Engine Advocacy, Free Press, the Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF), the Mozilla Foundation, and the Open Technology Institute.
Several of these organizations see it as a way to ensure journalistic outlets remain protected from censorship which would never have been possible before the rise of the internet.
âGovernments or third-party actors can attack a website to censor it when they could never have done so via the courtroom,â FPF Executive Director Trevor Timm told Slateâs Dan Gillmor (opens in a new tab). âThis most notably happened to WikiLeaks, but many other smaller sites have been affected at various times as well. Protecting at-risk journalists around the world from this type of extrajudicial censorship will undoubtedly be beneficial to free speech.â
Nearly 100 sites are already being protected under Project Galileo, CloudFlare CEO Matthew Prince noted to Ars Technica (opens in a new tab). The Project Galileo site emphasizes that it will work to accept âany qualified vulnerable public interest web property.â
(iStock/Thinkstock)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!