Article Marketing / Communications 2 min read
Association Touts Benefits of Data-Driven Marketing
A new initiative of the Digital Marketing Association, combating negative publicity and scrutiny from lawmakers, will tell consumers why data-driven ads aren’t such a bad thing.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
Do you ever wonder how Google or Facebook knows exactly which ads to place in your browser—the ones you can’t help but think are directly targeted at you?
It’s a marketing technique derived from mining people’s personal information on the internet, and it’s gotten some bad press lately (opens in a new tab).
The Digital Marketing Association (which has also faced controversy over its “do not track” stance) thinks data-driven marketing is getting a bad rap, partly thanks to recent congressional investigations (opens in a new tab). In a bid to change that, DMA—whose mission is to advance and protect data-driven marketing—announced a new initiative, the Data-Driven Marketing Institute, this week.
The $1 million campaign will focus on educating consumers and policy makers on the benefits of data mining as well as the privacy protections available to them, The New York Times reports (opens in a new tab).
“The Data-Driven Marketing Institute (DDMI) will redouble DMA’s efforts to explain the benefits of the consumer data industry to the public and policy makers, with the goal of preventing needless regulation or enforcement that could severely hamper consumer marketing and stifle innovation, tamping down unfavorable media attention, and reminding and educating consumers about the many and varied ways that their needs are met and they are thrilled and delighted,” said acting CEO and President Linda A. Woolley in a statement (opens in a new tab).
Data mining has also been getting a lot of attention lately for its use in presidential campaigns (opens in a new tab). The Times reports (opens in a new tab) that together the Democratic and Republican National Committees have spent around $13 million on data acquisition this election season.
It’s helped the campaigns determine, for example, that Obama supporters are more likely to eat at Red Lobster, while Romney supporters prefer the Olive Garden.
Many consumers—66 percent (opens in a new tab)—say they do not want to be targeted with tailored advertisements. DMA’s new initiative will include an “expansive research agenda” looking at the value of this type of marketing to the economy as well as the consumer.
Â
Â
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!