Article Membership 4 min read
How’s Your Pricing Strategy?
Success in some areas can lead to a false sense of satisfaction. A closer look can reveal where you might be leaving money on the table.
Heads up: this content is over 5 years old, so some information may be out of date.
No money, no mission, the old line in nonprofitdom goes. Alas, that line contains no guidance on how, exactly, to earn that money. And, more precisely, how to price what youâre selling.
But if youâre struggling with that issue, youâre not alone. As I was working on my feature for the latest issue of Associations Now on pricing strategy, it quickly became clear that there are few hard and set rules about how to think about pricing. Except, perhaps, that you should be more confident about experimenting with pricing than you perhaps have been.
We had to be crystal clear on what we were going to deliver.
There are two reasons for that. One is that the lack of a coherent pricing strategy risks alienating members. Jay Younger, FASAE, president and CEO of McKinley Advisors, lamented the way that associations often handle pricing at the department level, rather than holistically. It creates âa dynamic in which your customer doesnât really know what to expect,â he says. âAnd over time it lends itself to an opportunity for decreased satisfaction from your customer base or your member base, because it becomes apparent that the left hand and the right hand donât know what theyâre doing.â So thinking about the cost and value proposition of membership, meetings, publications, and other products and services is an opportunity to more sensibly price them.
The second reason is that thereâs a chance that youâre leaving money on the table. Thatâs something that Destinations International discovered after revisiting its dues structure, which it hadnât paid attention to for a decade. As part of its pricing strategy process, the association developed a âheat mapâ that showed which members were engaging most with it. Engagement was most intense in the middle range of membership, in terms of budget. âThey were attending our events, they were buying our research, they were coming to our annual convention, they were paying their dues,â Destinations International executive vice president of member engagement Alison Best says.
But that success in the middle range created a false sense of comfort. Smaller organizations were less engaged and felt priced out, and larger organizations werenât seeing value. âWe werenât providing the thought leadership that those large organizations needed from a trade association,â she says. âThey were paying the checks because they knew it was good for the industry and they wanted to support the industry, but they really werenât feeling the association in their organization.â
In the retooling process, Destinations International decided to introduce a hefty hike in dues for the members with the biggest budgets, in some cases quadrupling or quintupling dues. Of course, that demanded that Destinations International do more for those big-budget members, investing in a more robust research operation. And it also involved a lot of personal contact from the association with members.
âIt was an all-hands-on-deck approach,â she says. âWe did an annual report last year for the first time in a long time that spelled out the value proposition a lot more clearly. That helped. We got on the road and visited people who were resistant. That helped.â Best says there were six months of such conversations before the association launched the increase last April.
And what did those skittish associations want to understand about the dues increase? Value.
âThey asked, âHow are those additional dollars going to be spent?ââ she says. âWe had to be crystal clear on what we were going to deliver that we had not been delivering in the past. âIncremental moneyâ for most people meant, âWhat am I going to get? Incremental value.â That was definitely a clear equation a lot of people talked about.â
Thereâs a fair amount of consensus in the association world about how to think about pricingâhow meetings are big moneymakers, while membership and publications and so forth provide more modest profits or serve as useful loss leaders. Nothing I heard from the association leaders I spoke with upset that sense of the universe; some associations I spoke with went through the pricing strategy process and realized big changes werenât necessary.
But that enlightenment doesnât happen without conversation. Itâs not just a matter of leaving money on the table; itâs also about seizing the opportunity to have a candid discussion about what value youâre providing to your membership.
How does your association handle pricing, and what changes has it made as a result of talking about pricing strategy? Share your experiences in the comments.
(OlyaSolodenko/iStock/Getty Images Plus)
Comments
Comments are for ASAE members. Learn more about comments on this site.
Log in to your member account or join ASAE!