Evolving Expectations

Meetings Made for Everybody

In this article:
Planners need to think about accommodating more generations than ever. Understanding attention spans is just the start. 

With five distinct generations currently in the American workplace, the idea of making an event that works for everyone can seem all but impossible. John Folks, CEO of Minding Your Business, an association consultancy, says associations have had difficulty adjusting to that reality, especially when it comes to connecting with younger attendees. 

“We’ve been designing events for boomers and then gradually introducing things for gen X and millennials,” he says. “But our core audience is no longer boomers—they might be 10 to 15 percent of the attendees now.” 

One common response to the need to better connect with younger attendees is to deliver shorter pieces of content.Agendas are now often filled with microlearning opportunities; “flash sessions” of 30, 20, even 10 minutes; and a greater emphasis on visual elements. Those things have their place, says Ken Holsinger, SVP, Industry Research and Insights at Freeman, an events agency. But he adds that meeting planners can err in thinking that appealing to younger attendees means simply catering to shorter attention spans. Rather, content should appeal to their practical mindset—their urge for content that is meaningful and actionable, without bells and whistles. 

“Boomers have been trained, just as the Xers that followed them, to do what’s expected of you: Ask them to jump and they’ll say, ‘How high?’ But millennials and gen Z, they’ve been trained to ask, ‘Why?’”

Younger generations will be tolerant of more conventional one-hour meeting sessions. But they don’t want to feel misled when they enter the room: A general session stuffed with awards, victory laps, and other rituals grates against emerging professionals who want practical, persuasive speech with helpful advice. (And a big-name speaker alone won’t impress them; see sidebar.) 

Content can appeal to particular generations, Holsinger says, so long as it’s tied to the association’s understanding of attendees’ needs, not generalizations about content-length tolerance. “Is it captivating, is it interesting, is it well-delivered?” he says. “Is it well-illustrated, does it make its point, and does it leave them wanting more?” 

 A Range of Options  

Still, meetings experts agree that the age of the one-size-fits-all meeting is long past. Folks says today’s meeting agendas “need to be tailored and customized for different groups. You’ll need asynchronous agendas and 60-minute ‘sage on the stage’ sessions along with quicker, more interactive sessions.” 

He adds that planners need to take a more proactive role in better understanding the needs of different attendees. Younger and emerging members want practical guidance and reception events that foster a sense of belonging, and ones that ensure they’ll interact with more experienced professionals in their field. After-event surveys should be more sophisticated as well, to better comprehend those needs.  

Folks cites the example of one association client that had become accustomed to a reception event that was familiar to a lot of older attendees—ballroom, food stations, bar, entertainment. That works well for established members who are looking for an opportunity to meet with familiar colleagues, but not for younger ones looking for opportunities to converse and network. Through Folks’ firm, it designed a “speakeasy” experience the following year to accommodate them, as well as an industry-trivia area that appealed to their comfort with gamification.  

The prior event got low ratings, Folks said, but he pushed to get clarification about what did work, which helped them design a better experience. “If you ask people, ‘What kind of reception do you want?’—that’s not a great question,” he says. “It’s much more effective to be asking, ‘Based on this year’s meeting and the evening reception, what aspects did you enjoy?’ Allowing for open-ended responses is really helpful.” 

Similarly, Holsinger notes that while younger generations may be more tolerant of session length than they’re given credit for, they are also more demanding when it comes to content that is clear and personalized. He notes that a social media environment that algorithmically pushes content designed to appeal to their interests means they have little patience for session descriptions that don’t say what, exactly, they’ll be learning. 

“Is it a matter of designing the content, or should we be designing the descriptions so that the audience can better self-select?” he says. “The challenge is that we don’t give them any information—in fact, we hide it from them. Content design needs to be clear, but communication about how attendees can select content needs to be clear as well.” 

Folks notes that meeting planners would do well to think not just about the design of events for the current mix of attendees, but for the rising generation of potential attendees behind them—how they consume content, what kinds of information they need, and what will give them the sense of belonging that motivates people to attend. 

“You have to think beyond, who am I serving today?” he says. “You need to ask, ‘Who do I want to be serving, or should I be serving tomorrow?’ And then design the event around the needs of those groups, right around the formats that they prefer, from an educational standpoint, a networking standpoint, and experiential standpoint.” 

Mark Athitakis

Mark Athitakis, a contributing editor for Associations Now, has written on nonprofits, the arts, and leadership for a variety of publications. He is a coauthor of The Dumbest Moments in Business History and hopes you never qualify for the sequel.

More from Evolving Expectations

View