“The key messages create consistency,” she says. “The sub-messages allow relevance to differing stakeholders and varying association activities.”
Think of the key messages as the foundation. These are stable regardless of context, woven into everything from the opening of a speech to the closing of a press release. The sub-messages flow down to meet the needs of different audiences. Together, they keep communications focused without diluting them.
The case for consistent messaging comes down to trust. When an association’s leaders speak from different perspectives—one emphasizing membership value, another focusing on advocacy, another on fundraising—without a shared narrative tying those messages together, the association can feel fragmented to the people it’s trying to reach.
“Inconsistency erodes trust,” Singer says. “When leaders speak from different lenses without a unifying narrative, the association feels fragmented. If no one clearly articulates the why, credibility suffers.”
Many Individuals Speaking With One Voice
While ultimately meant for many stakeholders to speak to different audiences, Singer cautions that messaging should not be written by committee. The process works best when one person drafts the messages and then seeks feedback. Too many voices at the drafting stage tend to produce language that tries to satisfy everyone and ends up resonating with no one.
Word choice, she adds, carries more weight than many associations appreciate. The right words aren’t generic—they carry specific meaning within a given industry or sector, and getting to them requires deliberate work: time at a whiteboard, conversations with people who understand the association and the community it serves, and a willingness to keep refining until every word earns its place.