Brand and Influence

Why Messaging Should Be a Part of Your Core Brand Strategy

In this article:
Associations focus on perfecting their visuals, but it’s the words that define who they are. Here’s why consistent, intentional messaging belongs at the heart of every association’s identity.

Ask most association leaders to describe their brand, and they’ll talk about logos, colors, and design. Ask them to describe their verbal brand—the words their association uses to explain why it exists—and you’re likely to hear a variety of answers” or “and perspectives are likely to vary widely.

Just as a visual brand depends on cohesion and consistency to be effective, so does the language an association uses to tell its story. Sheri Singer, founder of Singer Communications and a brand strategist for associations, says the verbal brand is the piece most associations consistently underinvest in—and the one most likely to undermine trust when it’s missing.

“Most associations manage their visual brand well—logo, colors, typography,” Singer says. “What they overlook is the verbal brand. If you lined up board members and staff and asked them to describe the association’s purpose and value, you’d likely get different answers. That inconsistency creates confusion.”

Messaging Is Not Your Mission Statement

Mission statements are central to associations, which is why nearly all associations have them and make them easy to find on their websites, but messaging goes deeper than a mission statement. Singer estimates that only about a quarter of associations have formal messaging guidelines, even though nearly all have some form of creative or visual brand standards. That gap matters more than most leaders realize.

Messaging draws out the association’s purpose, fine-tunes it, and makes it usable across every context—from a keynote address to a social media post to a hallway conversation at an industry conference.

“Brand messaging isn’t simply rewriting a mission statement,” Singer says. “It’s defining your purpose and impact in a way that resonates.”

Singer points to author and speaker Simon Sinek’s concept of “start with why” as a useful frame. Most associations know their what and their how—their programs, their member count, the year they were founded. But the why—the reason the association exists and the difference it makes at this moment in time—is often buried rather than front and center.

Consistency Builds Trust, Fragmentation Destroys It

So, what does messaging look like in practice? Singer recommends building what she calls a messaging architecture: three clear, evergreen key messages that anchor all communications, supported by tailored sub-messages for specific audiences, programs, and events.

“The key messages create consistency,” she says. “The sub-messages allow relevance to differing stakeholders and varying association activities.”

Think of the key messages as the foundation. These are stable regardless of context, woven into everything from the opening of a speech to the closing of a press release. The sub-messages flow down to meet the needs of different audiences. Together, they keep communications focused without diluting them.

The case for consistent messaging comes down to trust. When an association’s leaders speak from different perspectives—one emphasizing membership value, another focusing on advocacy, another on fundraising—without a shared narrative tying those messages together, the association can feel fragmented to the people it’s trying to reach.

“Inconsistency erodes trust,” Singer says. “When leaders speak from different lenses without a unifying narrative, the association feels fragmented. If no one clearly articulates the why, credibility suffers.”

Many Individuals Speaking With One Voice

While ultimately meant for many stakeholders to speak to different audiences, Singer cautions that messaging should not be written by committee. The process works best when one person drafts the messages and then seeks feedback. Too many voices at the drafting stage tend to produce language that tries to satisfy everyone and ends up resonating with no one.

Word choice, she adds, carries more weight than many associations appreciate. The right words aren’t generic—they carry specific meaning within a given industry or sector, and getting to them requires deliberate work: time at a whiteboard, conversations with people who understand the association and the community it serves, and a willingness to keep refining until every word earns its place.

“These messages need to be intentional, thoughtful, and consider every word choice as well as the audience’s short attention span,” Singer says. “In a distracted world, clarity and brevity build credibility.”

It’s important to keep in mind that messaging is also not a one-and-done exercise. Singer recommends revisiting it every one to two years, or whenever the association’s goals or external environment shift significantly. As the world changes, the words that best capture an association’s purpose may need to change with it.

Training the Messengers

Even the most carefully crafted messages only work if everyone carrying them can deliver them consistently. That means investing in message training for staff, board members, senior leaders, committee chairs, and anyone else who represents the association publicly.

Singer advocates for ambassador programs—formal structures for equipping key voices with the right language and a sense of shared ownership over the association’s story. But even without a formal program, she says, the basics of message training are essential for anyone who speaks on the association’s behalf.

“Even if you don’t have something like an ambassador program, you have a staff and a board who are the main carriers of your message to others,” Singer says. “That comes into play in many different areas, making it all the more important for everyone to be speaking the same language.”

The Words Are Worth the Work

In a crowded, distracted information environment, associations that communicate clearly and consistently have a meaningful advantage. The visual brand may be what people see first but the verbal brand is what stays with them, builds their confidence, and earns their loyalty.

The starting question is simpler than it might seem: Can everyone who speaks for your association today tell the same story? If the answer is no, that’s where the work begins.

Sarah Sain, CAE, a contributing writer for Associations Now, is the senior manager of marketing and communications at the Association of Old Crows.

More from Brand and Influence

View
The range of tools members use to connect has diversified. Associations are working to keep up.